* Fullscreen command from an extra running copy ignored (Issue WW-414) * Alpha transparency for tool bar icons (Issue WW-405) * Dynamic custom terrain loaders (Issue WW-397) * Improved error window during crash (Issue WW-351) * Mouseover text appears first (Issue WW-252) * configuration Wizard runs first (Issue WW-416) * SVS loads layer list fixed (Issue WW-422) * Redundant rescaling icons fixed (Issue WW-423) * Menu bar can remove buttons (Issue WW-399)
#Nasa world wind and twitter download#
* Terrain data won't download and build a mesh when terrain is disabled (Issue WW-394) * Plugin unloading when quiting (Issue WW-393) * Seperate XML settings file for different versions (Issue WW-368)
* Renamed Startup Wizard to Configuration Wizard (Issue WW-360) * Removed obsolete projects (Issue WW-347) * Configuration Wizard addresses all settings (Issue WW-301) * Added distance measuring tool (Issue WW-131) * Opacity Control for showing index of ThemeLayers (Issue WW-25) * Added transparent color for textures (Issue WW-442) * Blue Marble uses terrain (Issue WW-239) * Moon atmosphere disabled (Issue WW-445) * World changing support through menu system (Issue WW-444) * NRL Realtime weather integrated (Issue ADD-29) * NASA Blue Marble Next Generation integrated (Issue WW-443)
Not that I checked it but isn't it actually smaller? This programme isn't massive compared to Google Earth. I recommend neither programme if you have only a slow connection or a small download limit (less than 1GB per month) as due to the nature of the programme they both have to download a large amount of data. Having tried both, and having an open opinion, they're both good! Detail wise for the actual application of the programme they both represent what is best available to the general public without paying for it (or what data the programme has access to). Of course, the other person could be working for Google :D Thats completely different and it sounds as though the person tried Google Earth and wasn't impressed with its features, its compatibility with his system, or the detail available for the areas that they're interested in. Sure you can try it but if you have reservations then that would affect your opinion of it.Īnother review stated that Google Earth is crap and they prefer this one better. It makes it sound as though you haven't even tried it with an open opinion. I agree that its silly saying one programme is crap because you don't care for it and you're an avid user of another programme. This is an excellent programme, sure there can be improvements or modifications done to it to make it better, but what programme doesn't?
0 kommentar(er)
